Saturday, 28 January 2017

Negros X Whites = Why Are We Always Violated?

I was always very confused about all that happened to me since that end of 2001, but Judith Cook did tell me it was all to be blamed on the Indian woman from EOC, and therefore on a negro woman. Once more, I did tell EOC and the woman was removed from it, so that she should be a no-doubts case. I arrived at Shepherd's room long time after Asha had dropped my dream project, as for RMIT, a project I had described almost in full detail to Trevor Skinner by end of 2001, to the level of where to get the paper, what sort of paper, who would help with supervision lines, etc., and she was saying good things about me, like it seemed that she was saying that I did an excellent job with the paper, the thesis, and my presentation, which she never let me put on air, basically. She had only two minor remarks, one of them was actually wrong, and I would prove that later, once more, and she therefore seemed to be doing my story, the story I had given to Trevor, which would be that the negro race people would be together with me, since we should be all oppressed. Well, I have just been all compliments to Prof. Eric Arceneaux, who I found on YouTube, since, first of all, I had told Hamish I wanted to learn how to sing from those guys who prepare people on TV to sing, and some of those shows were actually my idea, the shows on skills, by the way, those that started after Trevor speaks to me in that end of 2001. I then found this guy somehow in my YouTube search engine, and loved it: It was just like what I expected. I was then all compliments to him, put him in my blog with Blogger, as you can see on, and I even practiced all his classes and thought I had improved my singing quite a lot, finally recording a new piece, which I sent to him together with a link to my website to reassure him that I had really appreciated his work, that it matched my thinking when it came to Education (holistic, skills, etc.). He then added tokens to his video, as you will see in the recording I here publish. You will notice that he said, where is the hat, for instance. When The Brazilians started to victimize me more heavily in Australia, what happened after Trevor, they talked about me needing to wear a hat to become somebody, like that I was not beautiful, interesting or attractive otherwise. They always used the native Australian people to hurt me like that up to when I go to Brazil, forced criminally to do it, due to things just like what I have just described, and I then find out they were behind each, and every, criminal attack I suffered also in Australia. He also says something in French because I know French a bit. He still puts his finger on his face to imply crying, so that that is to mean that I am singing badly, and therefore have not improved with his classes, as incredible as it may seem. From there, since, very unfortunately, despite my considerations regarding people as individuals, I do notice, as told to Trevor in the end of 2001, that people frequently attack others as a class, I concluded that the negro race people, therefore the Indians as well, as Judith Cook said, organized themselves and made use of electronic gadgets to victimize me better since that end of 2001. Once more, all whites are attacked with priority and privilege in Rio de Janeiro by all negro race people in the place all the time, all gratuitous. Notice that the same happened in the USA by the time of apartheid: Negro race people could always be to the white side, never strong violence, or very rarely, but rare would be the white who would have survived any visit to their side. I now believe Asha had an American Dreamz bug in her ear and some security guard, another person of negro race, more than likely, let her aware of where I was at RMIT, so that she would calculate what to say by the time I open Shepherd's door, and I would then think it was my story and the poor women of Australia, as oppressed as I was in terms of Science, would then have helped me to best by saying that I did all I had to do to best, but they could not graduate me or keep on going with the project because of the agreement they had with whomever or ethical concerns because of Comellas, whatever. Once more, that story was never supposed to happen either, I was just depressed and confused, Trevor should be there to help me and was supposed to be a nurse. Only what was absolutely in my favor should ever have been passed to others. Notwithstanding, given my state, of total confusion, criminally induced by everyone else, I ended up thinking that chances were higher to the side of the women doing my story, what then led me to conclude they had helped and Shepherd had attacked. I had a truck passing in front of my eyes, a sort of stalking me on my way from RMIT to where I was living, and they had MEN'S WAY on the side of it. That was to make me think men were all attacking, is it not? I also had the name JOHN SHEPHERD appearing on a box at my house, my address, in St Kilda East, at a certain stage, Brendon Matheson having brought the boxes home, another one written DAVID on it as well. Well, we then think Shepherd would be attacking me, is it not? Joanne Kelly still said that he was a harasser, that a female student had once denounced him. Never ending stuff. Oh, well, now that he made this aggression, quite gratuitous, and I put that together with the tons of negro race singers who recorded similar messages clearly with their voices in my songs (the only ones I could download for free from the Internet, which I was also getting for free, in an Irish lodge in Sydney), songs that I was using to help me rest at night, given the nature and amount of crimes and aggression, violence of every sort that I endure from 2001 to now, this after Obama was elected ( I don't believe he was elected for the first mandate, I think I am sure it was crime, and it was even illegal that he were a candidate, I believe he did not have an undergraduate ), still with the flight I had after his election when coming to Australia, which had exclusively negro race songs and movies, I conclude, once more, that the white people are being crunched for now 16 plus years, being attacked with maximum disloyalty in their intimacy and at work by negro race people. As I told Trevor in 2001, already sick of the negro race people in Australia, and their disloyalty with me, we include them properly, we act with maximum generosity, in the case of Princess Isabel she even freed them, but they are always acting with maximum disloyalty and backstabbing us. They are our parasites everywhere on earth, and they do all in the most shameless way as possible. Once more, Monica Pereira not only incited my entire college class to cheat, but she almost bashed me up in a room with my fellows to force me to do that. She is the person who prevented the nuns, Catholic white nuns, from saving me since at most 2014 by blocking our communications, first of all. She also injured me much worse, social networks and all else, herself. She is a person of negro race. A true marginal her entire life. Believe it or not, my school was supposed to have exclusively white people like me, but the nuns let her attend without paying a cent, the only one who did not pay in the class, also the only negro. And that is what she did already back then. Not only they don't have gratitude or reciprocity, as I told Trevor back then, but they are realistically in this world exclusively to destroy our peace, happiness, achievement, and steal all we have got without giving us a chance, and therefore to behave and act in a completely demoniac way. I still cannot believe that Oprah pretended to be helping, me, even acquired a private TV channel in Australia for that purpose, and she wanted nothing else but to scoff at me instead. They published in the press that the channel cost 1 million to make the scoff better. Were it not Obama, once more, I would have been saved by the USA at most in 2007. Instead, all these extra years of atrocities. It is unacceptable that we have even one place on earth without maximum apartheid. Once more, apartheid is to protect races under highest threat, such as white: we lose genetically, we lose physically, and we lose because of their gratuitous crime and extraordinary disloyalty everywhere on earth. More than anything else, they are our parasites, parasites of the white peoples, and they realistically live to injure us all gratuitously when we least expect. Only apartheid can save the white race from extinction. Once more, Mario, the negro race man sent to attack me in Australia by Andre, man of Veronica Pinheiro Vieira, another negro, said he married Carla The Vaca exclusively because of me and my attitude plus decisions. As for what Carla used to tell us, she adored him, so that I should have been responsible for what is best in her life. Instead of being grateful, and returning the favor of me helping her with at least maximum respect for my person, she is responsible for my every disgrace in Australia since 2000, starting with Priest forcing me to sit for an IELTS when I already had a TOEFL with more than enough score before I arrive in Australia. Asha Baliga destroyed white people, Australia, Brazil, women, Science, research, Education, compliance, etc. with what she did. They have no shame. From beginning to end, no shame, not even a trace. I still remember the negro race woman stealing my documents also recently at Carnegie in Adelaide, as described in another blog, and the negro race man stealing my vibratory platform when moving my things recently to Melbourne, all without a trace of shame or regret. One of the negro race men who took the things from my apartment in Adelaide, and those were realistically the finest that dealt with me in a long interval of time, even wrote in an e-mail that he had sent it to Melbourne. Not even so. I had to buy another, believe it or not. And I have so little these days, given the amount, nature, and extension of the atrocities I endure, it is not a joke. Not to be believed, one of the reasons why I ended up in Australia is finding a place like my Porto Alegre, where I was born: Not even a trace of a negro race person, and, because of that, quite sincerely, safe even to the level of a kid going on her own on a bike inside of high bush without suffering any violence. See: 

Sorry. No sound in the first one. So, pay attention, there was nothing odd in the recording before I sent him a message using my YouTube channel. I am now going back to his classes, as he instructs us to do, and as I think I should do, in the same way I went back to Julie Andrews' song a number of times to improve my singing before finding him. And, all happening in a space that is shorter than 2 weeks, I get this. 

Now, there is once more a negro race man who I thought was definitely going to save me as soon as he found out, Ed Motta, a famous Brazilian musician, and instead he became friends with one of the groups that is amongst the worst aggressors/violators, the house of Hermolga, Angelo Ricci, and he could then manage to know all these people who attack me with crimes of this sort. Once more, it was after I asked Ben Falah, from Udemy, to help me stay in the USA through a job (apparently he could be open to other proposals, but not a job), that I had the sound criminally destroyed both in my computer and in my online classes. Before that, the sound was super good, super clear (I changed computers since then). 

Thinking about it, I concluded that the thing black people most hate in whites is their generosity, what New Christianity has called Christian Acts. Thinking about all my contacts with them, what they do not seem to have is spontaneous kindness. When Eulalia Mancome, my black friend, asked Antonio Sienda to help me move from Andrew Clarkson's house, he hesitated and demanded an extraordinary amount of money for what he had to offer (AU$ 100 per week for a bedroom where there was a double mattress occupying almost the entire place and a desk, nothing else, something located in North Caulfield, which (the suburb), quite sincerely, I liked, but was a bit far from the CBD). All white people who I know would quickly help the person, check on how much they have later on, and then propose or find an alternative place for them, like they first help. They think very differently all the time. The doorman of SENAI was nothing but Christian in all I saw. The black kid killed him, shot to death. I think, quite sincerely, that they hate is kindness. They don't conform with us being faithful, for instance, and that being a natural desire in the white peoples, like, without any external interference, if they are left without anyone trying to change their minds, they are always faithful and romantic. I still remember Sergio Bastos, for instance, another negro race man from SENAI, asking me if I believed Rogerio de Oliveira (my white fiancee) was faithful. I said that, at that stage, I did. He was really unhappy and he seems to have invested, together with Fillipecki, in the opposite direction to the expected (make him be unfaithful). It is all very unfortunate. They changed the Christian church close to here, where I am right now, in Melbourne CBD, as reported in another blog, into a mercenary place. No whites are seen there anymore. They talk about donations and monthly payments to the institution. I think that, because they are so ungrateful (with us, whites), they would like us to do things with second intentions when we help them, so that they always try to find a secondary interest in what we do for them. From there, they get irritated each, and every, time we are simply generous and caring. 

You will notice that they say, I care, I don't care, when they are targeting me as well or people who are in my situation (they say that all of a sudden, as he does, like out of context, not making sense), and I assume they would be all whites. He does say that at least once in the class I here mention. Basically, it is only by doing what they seem to be doing indeed, like killing all my possible white helpers or making them be unable to help, that I would be stuck with black people (Ney Amado Costa, Germanus Strazzeri, Prof. Roberto, Walter Braganca Pinheiro, etc.). 





Friday, 27 January 2017

Logic Involved

One of the things that my destroyers use to convince the First World People to join the wrong side of the story, what means those who violate all the laws of AU and BR for extraordinary 16 ys + to attack us all in First World, is the following reasoning: Only when Brazilians learn how to value their own talent, and therefore how to value Marcia, we let them win, so that if they win, they win as a class.

It is just that those spreading such a thing are the second generation of The Brazilians overseas. In the beginning, we had a student at RMIT who had the typical Asian face and looks. This student also spoke English like a native Australian person, and had actually been born in Brazil. With time, they got people like the woman I met in Sydney, whilst working as a consultant: She had been born in Australia, therefore had no accent when using the English language. Her looks were those of a typical Australian native woman. For instance, she was overweight, big, and tall. Yet, her parents could not speak English at all. They then speak to the native peoples from First World and they accept that it is only when The Brazilians let me win that they will be winning. They convince them with a couple of examples, say the recent results in the Interpreting exams for NAATI. What they say is that The Brazilians are not entering any new level in their society. 

It is just that they forget to check all other levels. For instance, Regina Burashick, from UFRJ, probably entered an Australian location and sector no other woman from Brazil, apart from me until 2001, had entered: She is now working with Mathematics and Academia in Australia, Adelaide, UNISA, for many years, and, from here, she attacks all my rights and guarantees my exclusion. Another one got a job in England, language, at the university. Yet another one got a job at QUT, etc. They are spreading like a plague and those are all marginals, all involved as perpetrators in all atrocities I endure all these years, probably distributing my original ideas, sometimes worth millions, inside of their universities and pretending to be theirs. It had to be possible. Sometimes, they know who is a harasser because they come all over me since Trevor, with hopes of getting something, since I must be desperate (and I surely am, but not to the point of doing the things they imagine I will do). Because of that, they are able to send a woman of no class, no scruples, and she then gets in from offering herself. Lots of times I was in a situation even in my private life of having someone over me, lots of times someone who is married, and The Brazilians basically sent a replacement after I refused to basically serve that person sexually, believe it or not. It is sad enough to notice how people realistically only think of themselves, and never of Australia, First World, white race, democracy, ethics, etc. One must notice that that is how it started: Sever was interested in more stuff, so was Priest, like stuff that is not professional, and with me. Brazil sent a replacement in 2001. Florica Cirstea may have met Sever in a conference, as she told me, but she was there because Rubens Crippa, from Brazil, found a way for her to be there then. Rubens Crippa's specialty is precisely Differential Equations, but there was never any reason for Sever to get someone from that specialty. He clearly had infinite necessity of someone like me, and you can see that by reading my work, the bits that I, even under so much, succeeded in exposing through my publications, more recently through websites. Some things, such as the counter-example for s1-convexity, are pretty obvious, so that any person, from any other specialty, especially after I write a blog post with Master Yaser, should understand why I am right. He gets someone from Differential Equations because who is attacking me all these years is obviously Rubens Crippa and UFRJ. Once more, Crippa never wanted me to leave UFRJ, and did look pretty weird as he told me that I couldn't leave the place. You can read my reports on that in my other blogs. Well, the replacement started there. In 2002, both Lara Mente and Raquel left traces of their visit to my apartment with Bradley Paul Neal. That, according to my dealings with Trevor, would mean they both had sex with him. They were both married, just for starters, but they were also both Brazilian. One of them was married to a native Australian young man, son of the president of AUSIT, in 2001. They would be replacing me, I suppose, like once more, but this time in my private life, as if there would be a limit. 

When the racism levels in the spirit of those who listen to them are lower than the levels of love for the law and compliance, I may be finally saved, I may have my basic human rights restored, and I may have some justice, but this has not happened in 16 years +, very unfortunately. It is all a very elaborated plot, which seems to take all sectors of society one way or another, and it all has to do with what they spread is going on. In Sydney, when the FBI came all the way, Brazilian women implied it had been the Brazilian diplomacy to convince NSW police to say I never denounced things there. In reality, from all I was able to gather, some political moves made it possible that they replaced the chief, and the replacement was of horrible spiritual quality. To the side of politics, behind this all, there seems to be a woman of age and Greek surname and a young woman from the Green Party, this one supposed to be friends with Bradley. Patricia Petersen also joined politics for a time. 

You will see a lot of Brazilian men appearing all of a sudden in the First World universities as well: Adelaide University got one who had IME in his resume, young one. A few American universities got a few old men from Brazil, etc. 

In 2002, I spotted Helen, the secretary, going around with Robin Hill. I understood that was, more than likely, my replacement in terms of Robin Hill, who was then also a harasser. As you well know, he actually sexually and physically assaulted me in front of my students, plenty of them, during my MATLAB class. By the way, he was married to another Asian woman (Helen was Asian) and I got introduced to her someday at the university. Mali seems to have come to replace me with Jake (Panlop), when he started to make sure I would listen to him making arrangements to meet other women. I knew he was married because he had a ring on him. We had been conversing about S-convexity for a while and I was expecting us to produce work together, hope I always kept, but nothing else, since, first of all, I don't ever feel attracted to married men if I know they are married when I meet them, but I also don't feel attracted to superiors, older people, Asians, black men, Brazilian men since 2000, etc. They have been now doing this to me for a lifetime. I sincerely do not understand either why they would all feel comfortable ruining my life, body, and career to be sexually served or why the others, who eventually get to know of the atrocities I endure, would think that crime, if against me, is OK, like they won't do anything to stop it or they won't do enough to stop it. 

The last one to do such a thing to me I think was Corcoran or McHugh: They showed signs of wanting something personal, despite us clearly having a strong connection in terms of work interest and some similarity for certain things in terms of our pieces of Science. Corcoran seems to actually have passed me by in Melbourne at a certain stage, like I only know his face from the Internet. I am sure that only atrocities as heavy as those I endure could force me to need their help, support or anything else, since I was worth millions with my research results already in 2000, and never had problems, until Trevor, in terms of proving my competency in whatever I did.




What is Help and What is Destruction

Dr. Lea Maria had a dictum that meant a lot in these regards: Hell is full of good intentions. 

That basically means that lots of human beings have claimed to have good intentions when committing even the worst world atrocities against others. For instance, when the USSR existed under Communism, the government would be saying that was the best for the USSR, that they had Communism. As soon as they stopped that, however, people would be lining up to get McDonald's. They were used to eat in darkness, and inside of a very limited set of ingredients before that date. Was that good for the USSR?

Possibly, but perhaps it was not good for the people who lived in the USSR. You see, there is a difference between being good for an abstraction, a Country, a flag, and being good for a human being or a set of those: Good for the USSR as a Country, as a flag, yes, possible. Good for the USSR as a people, not necessarily. 

You can put lots of money together by not eating, but you can also die from doing that. Not eating is good for your budget, an abstraction, but not necessarily for you. That is basically it.

The psychopath went on killing people who were having sex with love in a certain American movie. He said he was cleaning the world or something, perhaps God asked him to do that. That is then good for cleaning and God, but, once more, they are abstractions. 

There is no possible help that opposes the will of those that are supposed to be helped when we are talking about adults who have legal rights to decide over their lives. Any subtraction of their rights to administer their own lives is a violence that is amongst the greatest that can be practiced against them. One second without autonomy is loss enough, imagine years? A human being cannot suffer worse violence, in terms of what is not physical, than being deprived from their freedom. The rights to be the authors of our own destinies are fundamental to guarantee that our lives are considered lives. 

What a wonderful world this would be if people were happy with what they have as themselves: their own body, their own head, their own choices. If they are not happy with those, however, they have to be obliged to conform because nobody can pay for their unhappiness that be not themselves. Find some theory to hang on to, that that is karma, curse, whatever. Nothing more important than freedom, than never suffering any violence, of any sort. Nobody is guilty of your disgraces, but, even if they are, we have chosen the laws and official systems, not physical reaction. We must be able to convince ourselves that life in community is worth it or we must be set apart not to injure others. Life in community means common decisions and one of them is how we deal with our own unhappiness. We have decided for being civilized, acting as a group, and following whatever our official rules say should be followed. If we are unable to comply, especially to the point of violating human rights, we should not be let alive because each one of us only has one chance in that body shape, in that human configuration, and it would not be fair that we lost not even one trace of it for someone else. We were each given theirs and we have rules that we decided would be the way we would approach things. 

Once more, periodically killing people is the same as periodically cleaning places: A necessity. We should definitely kill the members of our society that cannot respect the body or turn of others. People who are able to violate human rights that are as basic as freedom, privacy, and property usually betray their partners, usually hide their sexual choices from their most intimate people, say their best friends, usually lie at work, say allege headaches they never had to get a day off, and use names that can apply to any other being when dealing with their sexual partners (baby, love, etc.). There has to be easy ways to tell who is a psychopath from who isn't and Psychometrics can help us there. If those are periodically killed, a case like mine and mum's would never happen, so that people who are really productive and important, who literally move the wheel, would be able to express themselves in a proper way whilst on earth, which is ultimately what we want. Not killing these people means that a ton of really good human beings, who could bring extraordinary contribution to human kind, will never do that. We don't want them arrested, since that means they can still do something against the good people. We want them killed. 




Nothing More Important than Full Authorship

I think there is absolutely nothing more important than full authorship of our lives on earth: That it be good or bad because we did this or that, not because someone else did this or that.

People everywhere on earth should definitely be attacked and killed before they can usurp the rights to freedom, privacy and property of someone else: Those rights mean life. 

Human life is a gift from God to us and our bodies are a gift from our parents, so that we can live it. If the gift is ours, nobody can enjoy it in our place, and that is the only possible truth.

One thing is being attacked by normal people. Another is being attacked by the government in democracy and capitalism, as I am, now for more than 16 years, maximum violation of human rights. The UN should exist to invade and administer countries whose governments reject complying with their own constitution and international agreements on human rights. Nothing that I go through is really acceptable. There should be mechanisms in place at all times, so that nobody goes through what I go through since that end of 2001: Our bodies, intimacy, ideas, etc. would have to be absolutely ours. 




Monday, 23 January 2017

Rights to Hate, Reject, and Dump

I have been thinking about this for long now: This thing that men did to women all over the world and perhaps that the women did to themselves. What is our exclusive power, and power, not curse, which is stopping the race, exterminating it, or making it last forever, therefore the power of eternity, one of the powers attributed to God, has been changed into kindness, in the same way they changed, with Jesus' story, God into nice, friendly, forgiving, and inclusive. Women have been deprived from the rights to reject, hate, despise, and dump since Jesus' story time, I now reckon. We suffer the worst world violations all over the world and the first type we cannot hate, reject, despise or dump is the own women, the Leas or the Patricias, the Veronicas or the Carlas. 

We were given power, not a curse: Creating humans and destroying them by not procreating is power, power of God, not a curse. That does not come attached to any obligation if morality is dropped. In fact, I could have a male kid and use him for sex if feeling the need in the option where morality is dropped, just like a movie I once watched. That is power, not a curse. And it is power well beyond the power that God gave men. They then invented, in the same way they did with the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, that because we were mothers we would have to never reject, hate, despite or dump, like we would be obliged to help others, to never abandon, etc. People obviously confuse procreation with care. The Empire of God certainly does not do that. You don't call a woman mother just because she gave birth to a kid. You call her mother if she is also a carer. Even a whore can give birth. That does not make of her a mother. Mother is a social job, a social incumbency. I have seen plenty of men sexually abusing their kids. Nobody seems to charge them on fatherhood apart from me. In their case, things seem to be detached by default: They procreated, gave birth through their chosen procreator, yet are not necessarily fathers. As for what we see everywhere on earth, lots are actually doing the impossible so that they are never fathers, by the way. We must pay attention to the fact that the god of The Bible is the god of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, therefore the god of the Jews, and the Jews, as for what everyone else thinks, are pretty nasty people, so that it is very unlikely, just for knowing that, that God is generous, kind, and inclusive. As another point, even if we embrace the gift they usually attribute to Jesus, but that I insist was not his gift, that of generosity, and decide to also be carers, being then proper mothers, that obviously does not imply that their attitude toward any other human being who be not our own kids will change: We are their  mothers, not mother of anyone else. When this extension was made possible is the big question. Nowadays vets have the courage of making puppies be fed from other tits, for instance. At least they make sure the mother accepts that, as for what they tell us. We are at most responsible for those we gave birth to, this even in maxima levels of morality, and the own motherhood never implied generosity. All that is attributed in a rational manner to God can be attributed to the mother in terms of relationship to the dependant, and that includes heavy punishment for very small faults. I think men usually change women's generosity, extreme generosity, when voluntarily taking care of them, say at work, into motherhood attributes, so that, first of all, they do not have to give anything back. That is nothing but their disloyalty popping up again: Taking care of them is not something that makes us feel good. It is just something that we do because we want to show that we want to be their friends, at most that. Friendship DOES imply a two-way road, and you cannot get rid of your share in the story by simply creating marketing sentences, such as that is her fulfilling her motherhood instinct, you know, she does not have kids. Having kids? I don't know, but it is only heavy amount of brainwashing that can make a woman want them. At most they are a consequence of being deeply in love with someone, and a consequence that we sometimes don't mind embracing. I definitely don't think there is such a thing as motherhood instinct, and I have more than enough evidence to prove that. Men invented that, in the same way they invented that God was generous, inclusive, forgiving, and tolerant, in the same way they invented that those who procreate are automatically father and mother. That is a title one must earn instead, just like a PhD, quite sincerely. 

Sincerely, even Buddha and Jesus turned their backs to their families and walked away without ever going back. Some say Jesus had wife and kids in Egypt, even that. And he would then have walked away from his second family on the occasion. We have more rights to hate, despite, reject, and dump, not less, for we were given more of God's powers, not less. 

I turned my back on Brazil in 2000 to never go back. I had the rights to. Problem is practice. I turned my back on my relatives and everyone else from Brazil and finally walked away to never be with them anymore, just like Jesus and Buda did someday or even more than once. They are seen as heroes, saints, etc. Why not me? People go and serve them to the best that they can, even with their lives, so why not me? Instead, I am criminally cursed to exist in slavery since at most 2001. First oppressed by the Australians who were being induced to attack me by The Brazilians, Brazilians behind all aggressors/violators all the time, then, when I could not defend myself anymore, almost in the open by The Brazilians. It is all democracy, capitalism, they all sign for human rights, Australia and Brazil, so what in a hell, literally speaking. 

I am not obliged to care about anyone I have ever slept with or even about those I had kids with for as long as Jesus and Buddha are saints and people are not legally forbidden from adoring them, quite sincerely. I hate everyone I dumped because I always dumped them for their mistakes,  usually moral. I am entitled for as long as Jesus and Buddha have even one statue in a public place, quite sincerely. 

Basically, I tried Brazilian or Last World dick, used, and did not like. I was using First World dick, loved in that 2001, and realistically never wanted to spend one more second with anyone from Last World at least in my intimacy. I think I am sure I had the rights to. I also had infinite rights to love dick and not vagina, to love sex with love and not only sex, etc. Who had to do with my personal life is those who had to do with Jesus' or Buddha's: Nobody, regardless of how outrageous it all is. Basically. And this is all my generosity, extreme by the way, because I can only be forgetting all the laws, rules, and principles that the own men created and brainwashed me with my entire life if I still think I have to justify myself in what regards any of it. Adding to that, I dump and you get out of my life, as every woman does everywhere on earth when men dump them: You don't go after me, you don't create problems in my life, and, if you ever want me back, that it be because you prove to me that you are doing more positive things for me, not the opposite, as it is the only acceptable way. Rationality is killing men who do not accept women saying they don't want them before they attack them, not the opposite. This is 16 ys plus I am paying for leaving The Brazilians behind, including Bradley Paul Neal and Andrew Clarkson, but, morality in place, they would be punished instead. Morality out, and I would kill them for their wrong doings, for that is what I think they deserved without morality being part of my universe. How can anyone drop morality and therefore our laws as well and attack me if we did not agree on any of it, and therefore I did not have a chance of skipping it in order not to lose in the way I do? WE chose democracy and therefore maximum loyalty in competition in Brazil and Australia, not the opposite. 

In the same way, morality in and I serve people ethically, and therefore correctly, to the best that I can, as I always do and did, since morality is my choice, and it is the official choice both in Brazil and Australia so far as well, morality out and I can injure them as they all do to me since end of 2001 at most. I will die being moral and I definitely think no immoral could be tolerated in Brazil or Australia, since my choice is the choice of the majority. 




The Rights to Ask for Help and The Duty of Serving

So, I am here struggling with the fact that the own authorities for law and order not only never listened to me properly, but never learned their lesson properly: That the laws must be complied with at any expense unless what we do could be supported by a honest court of law. 

Apparently, people like Koji Tanaka, who came out of the blue to Australia in 2000, as a reaction to the developments of my struggle with Graham Priest and his ways, would defend that I had to do whatever Priest wanted me to do in my academic life, and that is why I deserve crime or being treated as less than a human being, that is, not having my human rights respected, basic ones, such as privacy, freedom, and property.

I have read a bit about Japan and Japanese culture and I know that there the women had to, for instance, wear shoes that were smaller than their shoe size to please men, so that they would walk in the way we see the geishas walk in the movies: Small steps, one leg glue to the other, etc. The levels of oppression over women were then highest. 

It is apparently assumed that Graham Priest was doing a great favor to me when allowing me to have contact with his theories and studies, since he had about 100 papers listed with the Philosophers' Index in 2000. I however assure you that I would have more than 800 in 2010 if never attacked, being therefore a greater star than him if never attacked criminally. Women, however, are attacked criminally all over the world not to shine higher than men at work, and sometimes even in life.

As we know, and are tired of saying, every action generates a reaction of same strength and opposite direction. There had to be at least one place on earth where Anti-Islam were the rule, since that would be the reaction of women to Islam. It is my idea to have the Anti-Islam, in principle, but, given that we all agree with the principle from Physics, that of the reaction, it can only be that I am the only one who could express this idea, just expressing, not making it be a reality, this since 570 or circa AC. The levels of crime against women all over the world and throughout human history can be better measured by studying Inquisition, I reckon. 

Well, basically, I never ever wanted to be a disciple of Graham Priest, believe it or not. I came to Australia to learn how to do professional research instead. In 2000, I was interested in spending my second semester with either Hyde or Brown, perhaps all of them, perhaps even with Priest included in the bunch, since I was interested in working on my Sorites Paradox solution. I was paying for my course, so that things cannot be more outrageous than they are. I pay, I choose, but, to make it worse, I only came because of the promise of the University of Queensland, which was that I could do whatever I wanted in my postgraduate course, like finally, and that was precisely what I was after in Brazil for long but did not find. Everyone who knows me, who I trusted enough to converse about my aspirations, knew of my search and wishes in those regards (postgraduate courses). I do understand that Priest needed a disciple, thought I was a good opportunity for him, and I even understand that what he does is considered very valuable by plenty, but I also see myself as a superbly valuable person, woman, and professional, and I don't see why what I did or do would be less than what he did or does, apart from crime. I had the rights to refuse to be supervised by him in the second semester, and I did exercise those rights, but I was violated to an extreme and forced to him in the second semester. As a consequence, I am treated as a marginal since back then. I must say that men are served everywhere on earth since the catastrophe that the death of Jesus Christ was: First of all, I don't believe his life was anything they say it was. Since he could never write about it himself and I literally was not there to testify on those reports being accurate, but it is clear that they are contradictory in a few pieces, and therefore very unlikely to be true, I have to cope with what men from the Catholic Church did to those. Before Jesus Christ, men and women were equal, as it should always have been. Couples were couples, as it should always have been. Either both are served or nobody is and we live in a society that is simply reasonable, where people must have inner value, and therefore deserve the love, company, and sex of others to get those, we live in a society where our nos are well heard and respected to an extreme, way more than our yeses, since hard is respecting a no, not a yes. 

He may have dedicated his life to all that, but I have the rights to think it is all sh.. basically, and I have the rights to prefer spending my time and resources in general with Brown or Hyde back then or even with the three of them instead of him. What men do not seem to accept is the dislike option of Facebook, quite sincerely, but I cannot blame them if the pivot of all I endure that gave me no fighting chance is actually women, like Lea Ricci Pinheiro could someday accept that I hate her: Obviously not. She could someday accept I did not want her in my life ever: Obviously not. I am attacked even before I arrive in Australia by her, so that she could get me not to stay here, etc. Men and women do not accept our basic right of rejecting them, of getting rid of them, of not having them in our personal space, it seems. In fact, not even in our professional lives. Anyway, I am here stuck with all hostility, violence, crime, and aggression one can get on earth since at most 2001, when I complained about harassment of Priest, Agnella Ricci Terra, Joao Carlos Ricci Terra, Bradley Paul Neal, and a few other people over me. I do understand that I was a likeable, relatively sexy, attractive person, but I also know that not even Tom Cruise has ever been forced to pay for inspiring passion, love, obsession, etc. on others. That is what we are supposed to do, us icons. Some will find in that reasons to live, as I found myself since 2007: Tom Cruise seemed to be helping me with something important, he seemed to be trying to save me from the crimes I endure, he also seemed to be interested in my person, so that I found in that inspiration to keep on going. Of course, that also produced alienation from reality and therefore less capability of fighting, so that there was a negative side, non negligible one. I go through a very weird situation since end of 2001, so that writing about it is very complicated. In a normal situation, however, muses were always told to help us, to inspire us, to increase our achievement and happiness levels, not to be harmful. Graham Priest was not my muse: I was my own muse. 

The fact that things were designed to oppress women, especially those born in Brazil, does not mean that I do not know my value and what I should be doing or getting already by college time. My mother was the greatest psychologist ever alive: Her mind was all on earth that mattered. Mine was shaped from hers, and I therefore inherited her clarity of reasoning and perspective: I knew very well how much I was worth ALSO compared to Priest, who, for me, was simply a drug addict, a harasser, an incompetent, negligent person, bad father, horrible husband, and at most a good HOD when the problem was not with himself. In my opinion, he was also a person to practice treason against the nation of Australia, since exhibiting the communist flag in premises of the Australian government can only be treason. Adding to that, he was oppressing all of us, students of Philosophy, together with his public partner, Patricia Petersen, when he was supposed to teach us the ways of free thinking, and therefore also free living: If it is free, I cannot be forced to be promiscuous, non-romantic, atheist or whatever else. Philosophy is and should be about freedom, opening ways, never closing. He may be a top researcher for everyone else, but I saw his work from close, and I do insist: No bad teacher will ever be a good researcher or presenter or anything else. No drug addict will ever be reliable enough to be OK as a professor, HOD, chancellor or anything else that involves responsibility over the destiny of others. In Brazil, I attended the finest educational environments because my parents adored education and invested all they had in it. I never ever had not even contact with a drug addict that would be leading any group of students in Brazil, believe it or not, during my courses. I came for the finest, for something better than there, but I ended up mixing with people who were doing drugs at my face during a supposed party for philosophers. As the police said very well since a few years ago in Australia, perhaps it all being my own idea, drugs and alcohol mean voluntary impairment of our mental faculties. We cannot accept people who are supposed to use their mental faculties to the highest levels voluntarily impairing their mental faculties, can we? Imagine doing that as a habit? How can those instruct others to use their mental faculties to maximum? Wouldn't that be the wish of society for those who attend universities however, regardless of position and topic? Only that one is absurd enough. 

Anyway, I do understand how they see things, but I am sure the democratic principles, the laws, the rules, the decisions of the thinkers on earth throughout human history, etc. point at the direction of me having my rights to privacy, freedom, and property respected to an extreme in places like Australia, not the opposite. These are 16 ys+ of maximum violation of human rights, and the job in Academia would have given me a chance of defending my person, my rights, at least a chance. The argument to exclude me seems to have been that I could not refuse to follow Priest if he wanted me to do that. Is that really acceptable? That the man was obsessed with having my person following him? That was my only life, head, and body and it was absolutely perfect before I am attacked in worse ways, what started in the end of 2001. Is it acceptable that the own government violates us in democracy? Zero second of this is what is acceptable, trivially. Is it acceptable that I am attacked by some Brazilians in Australia? How could this ever happen is my best question here. Is it acceptable that First World people and academics exclude me from life, from my own body, from my own person, violate me in all ways that is possible to violate a person for more than 16 years instead of using all they have to stop violation of human rights against me? Once more, we have Islam because nobody cares about the rights of women, including the own women who could do something. It sufficed we wanted and that atrocity would be over next day. Women are born without human rights in Islam every day. What is the actual excuse to let their religion exist anywhere on earth? I know people let the other one, of the voluntary mutilation, keep on going for a while. Could they have done that, though? Also, when you examine how long that lasted for, not even twenty years. Islam is out there for hundreds of years. It is obviously the case that it is still out there only because it is against women, nothing else. Even though women play their role as humans and defend men and women all the time, men only defend the own men if they ever bother. The whole trouble is the disloyalty involved. Men are bitches, naturally bitches, when it comes to what women did for them. 

Anyway, things are not what they look like almost all the time, I now know. Pretty sad is how men have the courage of acting with maximum disloyalty against us, women, all the time everywhere on earth.

You know, in Brazil, a white woman freed the slaves, and they were black, men, and women. I want to see the day men will finish with oppression against women and where on earth they will do that. 

Just the knowledge on how to kill without a trace would have saved my life per se. This is knowledge they will never give to any woman. Not even where to get the drugs, from whom to learn, etc. What is legendary is their disloyalty not their merit or value at work, I am afraid. I still cannot make sense of why I think therefore I am would be more important than if there is lettuce then there is tomato, like nonsense for nonsense. Yet, I saw this damn sentence everywhere on earth all the time. You know why? Because who said that was a man, nothing else. Women say things that matter at least sometimes, women like my mother, grandmother, and myself. Yet, I will bet that what they say will never be repeated not even half of the times they repeat I think therefore I am. Because society lets that happen, we are all brainwashed with the value and merit of men, and we all consider every woman to be something worse. Yet, if they are made of chocolate or marketing, something is very wrong in all we have. That something may translate into my martyrdom, which now lasts for more than 16 years.

From the women I heard that I was obliged to support them during my martyrdom, still suffering the atrocities, with them being responsible, for them to support me or my fights. I am sorry, but is that really acceptable? I had an entire life of treating everyone else with maximum equality and providing best services in all senses to everyone else before I am attacked. I don't have to show any of that during my martyrdom: During my martyrdom I am supposed to have help that is best, what includes whatever makes me feel better. If that is Hamish, that it be Hamish. If it is Tom Cruise, that it be Tom Cruise. You are supposed to save me at any expense from any crime, especially atrocity. If there is anything stopping you from saving me, then you do whatever you can to make me feel better and cope better with all, obviously and trivially. I don't have to serve you better because I am in slavery, suffering maximum violation of human rights: You should save me immediately instead. If not able, then you do all you can for me to feel and cope better with all, nothing else. It is all inverted all the time in the head of everyone else, I am afraid, and that is the only reason why a case like mine, my mother's, my grandma's, etc., was ever possible. 

May God have pity on us and put it all back to end of 2001, quite sincerely: The life and destiny He originally planned for us in this world and time. 

Then comes the other part: If women are supposed to never ask for help and need others to interfere with their work or personal relationships, why is it that police originated from precisely those needs, and needs of men? What about the courts? One must remember that none of those was actually created because of women, but because of men. If they say women are not strong enough because they appeal to those, then they should obviously go back in time and study human history, especially the origin of those institutions and services.